(Here is the same clip in HD, but that 2010 YouTube vibe is part of the fun)

This clip is in the running for most-mocked scene of all time, but I think it’s good, actually.

First, let’s get some things out of the way:

1. The writers of NCIS know how keyboards work. (They probably used keyboards to write this scene, even.)
2. The director of this episode knows how keyboards work.
3. I’m going to go out on a limb and say >90% of this show’s audience knows how keyboards work.

This scene was not written this way because the writers think their audience is dumb and doesn’t know how a keyboard works. It was written this way because of the Rule of Cool.

The Rule of Cool states: an audience’s willingness to suspend disbelief is proportional to how cool a scene is.

Continue reading

Political advocacy is an important lever for reducing existential risk. One way to make political change happen is to support candidates for Congress.

In October, Eric Neyman wrote Consider donating to Alex Bores, author of the RAISE Act. He created a cost-effectiveness analysis to estimate how donations to Bores’s campaign change his probability of winning the election. It’s excellent that he did that—it’s exactly the sort of thing that we need people to be doing.

We also need more people to check other people’s cost-effectiveness estimates. To that end, in this post I will check Eric’s work.

I’m not going to talk about who Alex Bores is, why you might want to donate to his campaign, or who might not want to donate. For that, see Eric’s post.

Continue reading

Nearly nine years after part 1, I bring three new short ideas.

1. Keep in mind that scientific fraud happens sometimes
2. Clichés are good, actually
3. You must put unnecessary decoration on your useful items, or else you’re a weirdo

Continue reading

This post contains spoilers for Guardians of the Galaxy.

Continue reading

Investors often say that standard deviation is a bad way to measure investment risk because it penalizes upside volatility as well as downside. I agree that standard deviation isn’t a great measure of risk, but that’s not the reason. A good risk measure should penalize upside volatility, because upside volatility is bad.

Continue reading

Is it a good use of time to call or write your representatives to advocate for issues you care about? I did some research, and my current (weakly-to-moderately-held) belief is that messaging campaigns are very cost-effective.

In this post:

• I look at evidence from randomized experiments, surveys of legislators’ opinions, and observational evidence. All lines of evidence suggest that messaging campaigns are effective, but none of the evidence is strong.
• I write an estimate of how many messages it takes to get a bill to pass in expectation, and how much that costs. According to my model, changing a vote outcome takes 17,000 messages for the Michigan state legislature and 2.2 million messages for US Congress.
• I provide links to resources on how to participate in messaging campaigns for animal welfare, AI safety, and global poverty.

Continue reading

(that I still remember a decade later)

Evolution on Earth

Fact 1: When foxes are bred to be more docile, their ears become floppy like dogs’ ears instead of pointy like wild foxes’.

Fact 2: Crows can learn to use a short stick to fetch a longer stick to fetch food.

The basic setup of the experiment is: There’s a box with some food at the bottom. The crow can’t reach the food. The crow has a short stick, but the stick isn’t long enough to reach the food, either.

There’s also a second box containing a long stick. The short stick is long enough to reach the long stick. Most crows figure out that they can use the short stick to fetch the long stick and then use the long stick to fetch the food.

If you add a third layer of indirection, where they have to use a short stick to fetch a medium stick and the medium stick to fetch a long stick and the long stick to fetch food, most crows don’t figure it out but a few of them do.

I wrote a rap song about this experiment, it used to be on YouTube but I think it’s gone now.

Continue reading

When I was 18, my dad took me to the bank to get my first credit card. I had a conversation with the bank teller that went something like this:

Bank teller: This card gives 1% cash back.

Me: What does that mean?

Bank teller: It means when you spend money with the card, you get 1% cash back.

Me: But what does cash back mean, though?

Bank teller: It means you get cash back.

Me: …

The bank teller communicated poorly, and also I did not do a good job at articulating which part I was confused about. If I were that bank teller, here is what I would say to my 18-year old self:

Continue reading

I’m playing Elden Ring. I’m fighting a difficult boss¹, and I’m getting kind of frustrated. I die again. I’m thinking about whether I want to keep playing. I don’t know. Am I having a good time? I can’t tell. How is it that I can’t tell?

Continue reading

TLDR: The available evidence is weak. It looks like small protests may be effective at garnering support among the general public. Policy-makers appear to be more sensitive to protest size, and it’s not clear whether small protests have a positive or negative effect on their perception.

Previously, I reviewed evidence from natural experiments and concluded that protests work (credence: 90%).

My biggest outstanding concern is that all the protests I reviewed were nationwide, whereas the causes I care most about (AI safety, animal welfare) can only put together small protests. Based on the evidence, I’m pretty confident that large protests work. But what about small ones?

I can see arguments in both directions.

On the one hand, people are scope insensitive. I’m pretty sure that a 20,000-person protest is much less than twice as impactful as a 10,000-person protest. And this principle may extend down to protests that only include 10–20 people.

On the other hand, a large protest and a small protest may send different messages. People might see a small protest and think, “Why aren’t there more people here? This cause must not be very important.” So even if large protests work, it’s conceivable that small protests could backfire.

What does the scientific literature say about which of those ideas is correct?

Continue reading